From Jennifer Hudin
This sums things up nicely (CMG):
Thank you and I’m more than ready to tell you. I once told (I forget his name, but the guy who gossips all the time on the internet about Philosophy)
that I could probably name some unsavory fact about anyone he mentioned, because rumors are just that—rumors. He had published an internet article about
Searle and I was mentioned. I told him to be cautious because none of the things he wrote had actually happened. His response was ”but there are rumors.” Well, so what?
It’s a nasty profession and I think it’s because it is growing tired.
Thank you for your condolences for John. I will indeed mention them on Wednesday. We are still an international group of philosophers who hate the gossip and enjoy the old
fashioned spirit of the debate.
By the way, one of the most disappointing aspects of John’s trial were the former female students who would not have gotten into grad school without John’s recommendation, who then
made Searle-trashing into their way of advancing through the philosophy ranks. I’m sure you have had this experience.
Best as always,
Jennifer
When a professor is accused by a student of sexual harassment, the truth doesn’t matter much. What really counts is the reaction of his colleagues and peers.
And the administration and press.