Entries by Colin McGinn

Necessity and Change

Necessity and Change Necessary facts don’t change. The table never changes from wood to plastic or metal: it is necessarily made of wood so can’t become made of plastic or metal. The number 3 is necessarily odd so can’t change into an even number. But the table can change its location or color and the […]

Share

A Story About John Searle

A Story About John Searle In 1984 John Searle gave the Reith lectures in England. This was a big deal and quite an honor. I was asked by the BBC to join a small panel commenting on these lectures. After the program was recorded, we went to a boozy lunch set up by the Beeb. […]

Share

More on Searle

Jennifer Hudin sent me this. Yes, actually, but I found a problem, I think, in John’s account of social ontology.  I’m not sure anything theoretical rides on it, but it is a puzzle nonetheless.  Everyone present agreed.   I will polish the notes up for you.   I was happy with the talk.  I managed to […]

Share

Attention and Knowledge

Attention and Knowledge In chapter XI (“Attention”) of The Principles of Psychology William James makes the point that the empiricists completely omit the contribution of attention in the generation knowledge. The reason is that attention possesses “a degree of reactive spontaneity” that breaks through the “circle of pure receptivity which constitutes ‘experience’” (402). Instead, he […]

Share

An Essay

Dear Prof. McGinn, I hope you are well. I saw that you recently posted an open call to dialogue on your blog, which reminded me that last year I wrote an essay in reply to one of your posts. You may find it interesting. https://www.thephilosopher1923.org/post/on-cancelling-and-repair Kind regards, Mary   Dear Mary Peterson, To be honest […]

Share

Block on Searle

Block on Searle Ned Block says: “Searle was a pugilistic philosopher, much more interested in winning than in truth”. This is a nasty comment, coming so soon after Searle’s death. It isn’t so much the imputation of a desire to win as the suggestion that this was more Searle’s interest than the truth. The clear […]

Share

Indictments

Indictments I welcome the indictments the current administration intends to bring against a list of people; not because they are guilty of anything but because they are not. In each case the allegations will fall apart, thus exposing the meritless nature of the charges. This will not look good for the prosecutors. It will also […]

Share