Catch America

Catch America

The reaction to Catch-22 constitutes an interesting sequel to the book itself. Ostensibly about World War II, it took off during the Vietnam war. It inaugurates the Sixties in America. Among the more perceptive critics, we find Robert Brustein writing in the New Republic (a magazine for which I used to write). He sees at once that the novel “has much wider implications than a war novel” to encompass “the postwar American world”. He writes: “Through the agency of grotesque comedy, Heller has found a way to confront the humbug, hypocrisy, cruelty, and sheer stupidity of our mass society—qualities which have made the few other Americans who care almost speechless with baffled rage—and through some miracle of prestidigitation, Pianosa has become a satirical microcosm for many of the macrocosmic idiocies of our time”. Those words could describe our present moment—and I don’t just mean Trump’s terrible tenure. I also mean the universities of the last twenty or so years, including the professors. Humbug, hypocrisy, cruelty, and sheer stupidity—these are all too familiar traits. Even worthwhile causes are tainted with them. It is easy to sympathize with the Yossarians of today. It is a world of fiction, paranoia, nastiness, hysteria, conformity, and (yes) sheer stupidity. The world of Catch-22 is the world we are living in, only magnified and extended.

Share
2 replies
  1. Howard
    Howard says:

    First, Bloom was disappointed with Heller as he was with Orwell, I think because Bloom looked down on the real world and preferred character as pulled off by Shakespeare; second, there is no Trump figure in Catch 22 though maybe in 1984

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Want to join the discussion?
Feel free to contribute!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.